Dark mode switch icon Light mode switch icon

Imported DNS Compared to ENS Native .eth Name

3 min read

The following is a comparison of native ENS .eth names with DNS names that have been imported to ENS protocol. By utilizing the ENS protocol, it’s possible to extend DNS functionality into the blockchain. There are however some important differences that should be noted.

[DNS to ENS] VS [ENS .eth Names]

Functionality DNS to ENS ENS .eth
Expires No Yes
Registration fee No Yes
Relies on DNS Yes No
Create subnames Yes Yes
Fuse permissions No Yes
Tradeable (NFTs) No Yes
Blockhain Record Storage Yes Yes
Resolve dWeb content Yes Yes
Universal Avatar (PFP) Yes Yes
Use as Web3 Identity Yes Yes
Point to multiple coins Yes Yes

There may be some exceptions with TLDs (.art, .box etc) that more deepy integrate with ENS. The architecture is different than an imported DNS name. For information on importing a DNS name into ENS see the support doc: Claim your DNS name

Originally published on by Zadok7.eth